The following contains spoilers for Poldark Season 2.

Elizabeth Chynoweth has never been in an advantageous position with readers. In the first instance, when the protagonist Ross Poldark returns to his home in Cornwall after the American Revolutionary War, where his friends and family assumed he had perished, he finds his first love Elizabeth engaged to his cousin Francis. When Ross marries his kitchen-maid Demelza, readers are posited to support the unlikely heroine, whose charm and earthiness captures their imagination. Therefore when Ross is unable to shake his obsession with Elizabeth, rather than Ross bearing the responsibility for Demelza’s unhappiness, readers might blame Elizabeth for ‘interfering’, or at least existing. When Francis is lost, a character who has redeemed himself beyond belief, it feels like a double betrayal when a desperate Elizabeth accepts the villainous George Warleggan’s proposal. So by the time Ross Poldark breaks into Elizabeth’s house and rapes her, the reader might be inclined to take Ross’s version of events, that Elizabeth acquiesced and eventually gave in to her own desires.

The author of the Poldark series, Winston Graham, treated his female characters with the same, if not more, empathy that he treated his male characters. He loathed the coarse and promiscuous stereotype of Demelza depicted in the 1970’s adaptation of Poldark; likely not in any small part because Demelza was based on his beloved wife.

Obviously there have been borrowings, chiefly from my wife. I took her sturdy common sense and judgement, her courage, her earthy ability to go at once to the root of a problem and point the answer; her intense interest and pleasure in small things; and particularly I have used her gamine sense of humour. As for the rest, most of it seemed to come from within. A romantic man’s perception of an ideal woman? That was maybe how it began… 1

Elizabeth fared little better in the early years of the original adaptation, a shallow and one-dimensional character, showing none of her unwavering loyalty to her husband when  she plans to elope with Ross. One proposed scene saw Elizabeth threatening to divorce Francis because of his infidelities, until Winston Graham pointed out that until the Act of 1857, divorce could only be achieved by Act of Parliament, usually took two years and cost about £10,000.2 The scene was grudgingly altered. Heida Reed’s Elizabeth has been portrayed in a far more flattering manner, emphasising her loyalty to Francis and her friendships with Verity and Demelza, and her deep maternal love for Geoffrey Charles. Television viewers are arguably in a far better position to empathise with Elizabeth than readers are.

Earlier in the year it was announced that the producers of the current adaptation of Poldark were cutting the scene where Ross rapes Elizabeth. The incident happened in the fourth book in the Poldark series, Warleggan, and should have been accepted, without question, as a violent assault on Elizabeth. Fans felt that altering the scene was problematic, betraying Winston Graham’s depiction of Ross as a deeply flawed character. Yet, for television purposes, it is not surprising that producers were unwilling to depict the main ‘hero’ of the story raping one of the heroines. The BBC assured viewers the rape scene would be cut, and that the incident would be consensual.

The scene was, in fact, deeply problematic on more than one level. What the BBC aired was not consensual sex. Ross Poldark, as depicted in the novel, broke into Elizabeth’s house, went uninvited into her bedroom, refused to leave and then forced himself upon her. Observe Ross digging his thumbs into Elizabeth’s face in the scene:

Hardly a scenario “born of long-term love and longing”, as Winston Graham’s son attempted to describe it, even if it showed Elizabeth finally ‘giving in’ to her passions. Claiming authority over the issue, Winston’s son Andrew Graham said that: “In the novel, Warleggan, the relevant scene is indeed consistent with the potential for rape but what then actually happens is not described and is left entirely to ones imagination. The only way to judge what my father intended is to read the novels as a whole. In doing so, it becomes clear from earlier scenes and from Elizabeth’s immediate reactions, that what finally happens was consensual sex of long-term love and longing.” Reading the novels as a whole, in fact, presents the opposite scenario.

The scene in Warleggan plays out as such:

He caught her again, and this time began to kiss her with intense passion to which anger had given an extra relish, before anger was lost. Her, hair began to fall in plaited tangles. She got her hand up to his mouth, but he brushed it away. Then she smacked his face, so he pinioned her arm.

She suddenly found herself, for a brief second nearly free. ‘You treat me – like a slut-‘
‘It’s time you were so treated-‘
‘Let me go, Ross ! You’re hateful, horrible! If George-‘
‘Shall you marry him?’
Don’t! I’ll scream! Oh, God, Ross…. Please….’
‘Whatever you say, I don’t think I can believe you now. Isn’t that so?’
‘There’s no tomorrow,’ he said. ‘It doesn’t come. Life is an illusion. Didn’t you know? Let us make the most of the shadows.’
‘Ross, you can’t intend … Stop! Stop, I tell you.’

But he took no further notice of the words she spoke. He lifted her in his arms and carried her to the bed.3

To describe this scene as ambiguous is faintly ridiculous. The novel does not end at this point, it is revealed that Ross forced himself on Elizabeth. Yet writer Debbie Horsefield told Radio Times that she never wrote the scene as a rape, claiming that:

“It’s interesting that people are getting outraged about the ‘dot…dot…dot’ moment, because what happens next isn’t actually described. It’s up to the individual reader to decide what the dots mean in that moment. There is a degree of ambiguity if you just read that chapter, though it is clear, subsequently, that when Elizabeth remembers the incident, she thinks of Ross’s ‘caresses’ and talks about not wanting to go from one man’s caresses to another’s.”

Horsefield claims that calling Ross touching her a ‘caress’ somehow implies consent. Elizabeth struck Ross in the face, begged him to leave the room, to leave her alone, to wait until tomorrow to talk and kept shouting “stop”; using the word ‘caress’ changes nothing that happened in that scene.

Some readers have also clung to Ross’s own reasoning, a little later in the novel:

“He was not proud of his adventure then, nor ever a man given to passing off his own behaviour with an easy excuse; but after the initial resistance that night there had been no particular indication that she hated him. Her attitude towards him during a number of years, and particularly the last two, was more than anything else responsible for what had happened, and she must have known it. Her behaviour that night had shown that she knew it.”4

Again, this cancels nothing out. This is merely Ross’s mulling over his own guilt and trying to justify his actions to himself. For the one rather alarming result of Ross’s rape of Elizabeth that after years of obsessive love she is suddenly out of his system. For Ross did not have consensual sex with Elizabeth, he went to her house to wreak revenge upon her for marrying his cousin and then agreeing to marry his enemy. And so he did. After raping Elizabeth, Ross had finally defeated her, thus he no longer needed her.

The following contains text from later Poldark books (no major spoilers):

Despite the claims that “what happens next isn’t actually described”, the three main protagonists of the series do describe it. Horsefield’s claims of proof of consent are taken from the following passage, where an unbiased reading suggests Elizabeth is feeling violated and does not want to enter into an intimate relationship with George so soon after the rape:

“Her impulse to postpone had been overwhelming. Whatever else, she was not a liar and a wanton. To go from one man’s bed to another – in the course of a few, days however disgracefully she had been taken advantage of. Still less could she go from Ross’s caresses to George’s. Perhaps that was at the root of her feelings.” Elizabeth – Warleggan

“A sudden wicked climbing in at windows, an incursion on her privacy, a violent taking of what was not rightly his. ” Elizabeth – Warleggan

“God, I am in a cage! Lost for ever! Why did Ross have to come? How I hate him for coming! And despise him. There’ll never be any friendship between us again! Only enmity. I shall be George’s heart and soul, his faithful wife and faithful friend! Anything I can do against Ross. Why did he have to come? God, I am in a cage. Lost for ever.” Elizabeth – Warleggan

Demelza understands what has happened but tries to put it delicately.

“You came upon her, I suppose, in surprise. I should not be astonished if at first she tried to be faithful to her new promise.” Demelza-  Warleggan

When Ross and Elizabeth finally confront each other in The Four Swans Ross again attempts to maintain the illusion that Elizabeth consented:

‘I came through no door as you know.’
‘Like the devil,’ said Elizabeth. `With the face and look of the devil.’
‘Yet you did not treat me so after the first shock.’ He had not intended to say it but she had provoked him into it:
‘Thank you, Ross. That’s the sort of taunt I should have learned to expect.’
‘Possibly. Possibly. But this meeting between us after these years. I can’t see the beginning or end of it
The end of it’s now. Go on your way.” Ross – The Four Swans

It is, in fact, after this meeting that Ross begins to realise how Elizabeth felt about the matter. He tries to reason that he felt betrayed, but he also claims that he did not regret it until that point. Ross later shows he still thinks women are objects for the taking. Talking with an adult Jeremy, Demelza tells him:

“What your father suggests. You cannot just “help yourself” to a woman. Even your father …’ Demelza paused, aware that Ross in fact had once done just that. ” Demelza – The Loving Cup

If the word of the victim and her so-called rival are not enough, perhaps Ross’s own admission should be convincing. (my italics)

“…in the very bedroom where he had taken Elizabeth against her will twenty-seven or more years ago, and so had started all this trouble, which had gone on so relentlessly and for so long.” Ross – Bella Poldark

Ross’s rape of Elizabeth has dire consequences, as readers of the books will know. Consequences that not only affect Elizabeth, Ross and Demelza’s lives, but consequences that resound through the next generation. Ross eventually comes to this realisation, but only after a terrible tragedy. At this point claiming the incident between Elizabeth and Ross was consensual may not alter the overall storyline a great deal, as television writing requires (or at least uses) far less subtlety in storytelling than a novel does. However, the fact remains that the producers of Poldark have tried to present a scenario where non-consensual sex was ‘secretly wanted’, that a woman can beat and scream at a man to leave her be, but that she would then give consent because of ‘long-term love and longing’.

Demelza also endures a violent assault in the same novel. It is obvious that Graham used the scene with Demelza and Captain McNeil as a direct contrast to Elizabeth’s experience. Demelza attended a party without Ross, fully intending to have a one night stand as revenge for Ross’s betrayal. She invites McNeil to her bedroom after the party, yet when he arrives and begins making advances, Demelza changes her mind. While she does have to fight him off, when McNeil (finally) accepts that Demelza wants none of him, he leaves. He is unhappy, he parts with a few stinging words, but he leaves nonetheless and Demelza remains largely unscathed.

The television adaptation of these two scenes is telling. Ross’s masculinity is often emphasised in Poldark, and the scene where he breaks into Elizabeth’s home frames him towering in the doorway, brimming with strength and self-righteousness, rather than breaking in sneakily and climbing through a window as he does in the book. The music after he kicks the door down is silenced. While dramatic music plays during Ross and Elizabeth’s confrontation, it is nothing like the wholly sinister score that accompanies what was a slightly comical scene in the books, where a foppish and drunken McNeil crashes about the room pursuing Demelza, who later climbs out of a window in frustration when even more irrepressible ‘suitors’ attempt to breach her door. McNeil is portrayed as a far greater villain than Ross, yet it is McNeil who eventually leaves when he is told his advances are unwelcome. And when Demelza tells Ross of the incident later and how angry McNeil was Ross exclaims “My God! So I should think!”.

The misogynistic ‘rivalry’ between Elizabeth and Demelza places both characters in a negative light. Demelza’s watching Ross and Elizabeth embrace at Francis’s funeral, for instance, might posit the viewer to think Demelza shouldn’t be envious of Elizabeth needing comfort. The encounters between Elizabeth and Demelza are always tinged with spitefulness. None of these things happened in the novels. There was no sneering at each other in the garden. Demelza certainly made her unhappiness with Ross plain at various times, but there was no relentless malicious remarks and she certainly did not strike him – the sweeping of the breakfast table should have been enough. It is merely material designed to turn the viewer’s sympathy to Ross, while they watch him work hard to earn Demelza’s forgiveness.

Yet Winston Graham never really suggested that readers should forgive Ross. Ross’s attitudes towards women remain largely unchanged as he ages.

As for Elizabeth, who was shown as quite capable in the face of adversity in the first season, her suddenly coming apart at the seams, her waiting for Ross at the expense of Demelza’s happiness and her manipulation at the hands of George Warleggan easily put her in a position to be despised. The heavy-handed reasoning for her to marry Warlegaan is unnecessary. She accepts Warleggan’s proposal because he is wealthy and can provide for her beloved son, and save Geoffrey Charles’s ancestral home from ruin. Why should Elizabeth need any other reason to marry Warleggan? Ross’s reasoning that Elizabeth was a catch and could have any man she wanted is false. There are few who would want to take on a poverty-stricken widow mired in debt, with another man’s son and his crumbling castle to upkeep. As Elizabeth told Ross, she is her own mistress. That she vowed to be loyal to George to spite Ross just shows her depth of feeling at Ross’s betrayal.

Elizabeth Chynoweth has been on trial since 1953. It is time we took her word for what happened between her and Ross that night and accepted her decisions are her own to make.











  1. Graham, Winston, Memoirs of a Private Man, Bello 2013, eBook, Chapter 4
  2. Graham, Winston, Memoirs of a Private Man, Bello 2013, eBook, Chapter 5
  3. Graham, Winston, Warlegan, Pan, 2013 pp. 313-314
  4. Ibid pp. 452

18 Responses

  1. Underdogge

    I remember being disappointed with the character of Ross when I read that scene in the books. Of course he was never a complete goody two-shoes. I read (most of) the books a good few years ago and did like them but didn’t feel comfortable about that scene. Should the BBC have “changed” the scene from the books? Well I wouldn’t want to see every detail of a rape – perhaps it could be intimated what was GOING to happen (well to be fair the book version doesn’t go into glorious technicolour). I don’t like the idea of anything that might foster the “She said ‘No’ but she meant ‘Yes’ trope. Changing how people from earlier centuries would have acted (in fiction) to give them a modern vibe is a pet peeve of mine. (Different topic but I get irritated by people who whinge that Shakespeare was mean about Richard III – as if he could have written that Henry VII was an absolute stinker when his grand-daughter was the reigning monarch for (most) of Shakespeare’s working life).

    Winstone Graham wrote a problematic scene in “Marnie” (the book was – to me at least – much better than the film) where she is unwilling to consummate the marriage and her husband takes her anyway, though he leaves her alone after that. Somebody said that Graham’s “The Forgotten Story” also featured a marital rape. I read that in my late 20s or early 30s and that aspect of the novel went right over my head.

    • Olga Hughes

      There is marital rape later in Poldark as well (no names to avoid spoilers), but in ‘Warleggan’ Ross also thinks to himself that he could go and take Demelza against her will if he wanted to, when he decides he’ll sleep in the library. He doesn’t, but his attitude towards women never improves, even in book twelve he is still being an arse. I haven’t read any of his other books but I found in Poldark Graham was careful to observe the female experience. Had he wanted Ross to be forgiven he would have made some changes to his character. Demelza’s the real heroine of the series in my opinion.

      • Underdogge

        Oh I think I know which incident you mean but won’t say anything because of, as you rightly say, spoilers. There was a marital rape in “The Forsyte Chronicles” which is not of course by Winston Graham. I don’t know about the laws in Australia but it’s only relatively recently in the UK (1991) that it was made illegal for a man to rape his wife – the quote following comes from Wikipedia. “The marital rape exemption was abolished in England and Wales in 1991 by the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords, in the case of R v R.[134][135] It had been promulgated in 1736 in Matthew Hale’s History of the Pleas of the Crown”. This is the link for the full article if anyone wants to read it.

        I suppose Ross could be a “good dude” – he did “rescue” Demelza when she was a kid; though he didn’t adopt her, he made her a servant, though of course he later married her.

        I’ll have to try and watch the remake of “Poldark” some time. I looked at a few YouTube videos and read some online articles and one feature said that the actress playing Elizabeth asked for the scene to be changed. I don’t know if that’s true or not. I was surprised (from watching an interview) to learn that the actress (Heida Reed) who plays Elizabeth is actually Icelandic. Dodgy English accents* are (yet another) pet peeve of mine but I honestly could not tell she was not English. She’s like Sidse Babett Knudsen (who I think went to international school at one time) and Gillian Anderson in that she speaks with an excellent English accent.

        * I’ll give a “pass” to Dick Van Dyke because I like his singing and dancing.

      • Olga Hughes

        I have always been surprised the marital rape law allowed that law to languish for so long.

        The show makes a lot of subtle changes to make viewers more sympathetic towards characters – Elizabeth in the books is colder, on the surface. One thing that irked me was changing Jim’s poaching from being something reckless that he did to it being necessary to feed his mother and sisters. Graham wrote them all as complex characters and it is a shame to see things simplified.

        The new adaptation is great, I tried to watch the 70s one and just hated it, especially Demelza. It must have gotten better, I’ve been dipping into Graham’s autobiography and he was describing how he was becoming more involved with the show. But I am not sure I will bother watching more of it. It was very much a soap opera. There’s an interesting documentary on youtube about it.

  2. Lee Jones

    If you thought Debbie Horsfield’s handling of Elizabeth Poldark was problematic, you should watch the 1975 adaptation. It was a horror story. From the moment when that series began its adaptation of “Warleggan” in Episode Thirteen, Elizabeth had suddenly been transformed into this snobby ice bitch. Worse, her reasons for marrying George Warleggan had to do with her desire for a wealthy lifestyle, instead of providing for her family and especially Geoffrey-Charles. Its seemed as if producers Morris Barry and Anthony Coburn wanted to justify Ross’ rape of her in Episode Fifteen. Then to cover up the rape and Ross’ character, they created the mob attack at Trenwith sequence in which the house was actually burned to the ground. And Ross was able to self-righteous save Elizabeth and George from being killed. It was sickening to watch.

    • Olga Hughes

      Sorry for the late reply Lee. I did try watching a few episodes of the old adaptation and found it so awful and so far removed from the books that I didn’t pursue the second series. None of that sounds surprising. It’s another attempt to save Ross’s character for the screen by making out that Elizabeth provoked him somehow, it’s so horrible. I read that they burnt Trenwith down in Winston Graham’s bio but I had no idea it was to make Ross out to be a hero saving George from being killed, that does sound sickening!

    • Olga Hughes

      Yes we are caught up and predictably I had a pathetic comment emailed in that Elizabeth ‘equally contributed’ to her rape, just this morning.

      Episode 3 depicted her as emotional and unreasonable, in the usual misogynistic manner. One moment she is happy to leave her son (completely out of character) and blather on about how marvellous the city is, the next both her and George are feeling remorse at the trial? George, remorseful? It may have been an attempt to show that Elizabeth’s iciness is a veneer but she simply comes across as inconstant, nor does she stand up to George as Demelza stood up to Ross this episode, showing her as the weaker woman as usual.

  3. Kaitlin

    This is an excellent article & basically exactly how I feel about the whole thing.

  4. Pam

    I cannot believe how horribly Ross treated Elizabeth! I have only watched the series, and thought the BBC tried to make it consensual. So I’m just responding to what a piece of shit he was to her AFTER. To treat her so coldly, to lose all interest in her the moment he ejaculates…what a piece of shit! I have lost all respect for the character and all interest in the series.

    • Olga Hughes

      After a really wonderful first season I’ve been growing more and more dismayed with how the female characters are depicted in the television series as opposed to Graham’s thoughtful treatment in his books. Ross isn’t portrayed as a perfect wonderful hero in the books and although they tried to take him down a notch this season they still try to lay part of the blame on female characters for his own actions. It’s always heartening to see people who see through that sort of mysognistic garbage but it is so typical in television. The books are really wonderful, you should give them a try.

  5. CTrent29

    I do not think that the 1975-77 series did a great job in adapting the first three novels in the “Poldark” literary series. Too many changes were made, especially near the end of the first and third novels. I thought the 2015-2019 series did a better job in adapting those first three novels. The 70s series’ adaptation of “Warleggan” was just awful to me, especially in that production’s depiction of Elizabeth Poldark. That miniseries was willing to show the rape, but it depicted Elizabeth as someone who “had it coming”. Worse, the series went out of its way to pretend that he had never raped her in the first place.

    The 2015-2019 series did a better job in adapting Graham’s first three novels. However, I was not that keen on its handling of the Karen Daniels’ character. I found it rather one-dimensional. It started out well in its adaptation of “Warleggan”, but I noticed, like you did, the ugly maliciousness that seemed to taint the occasional scenes between Demelza and Elizabeth. I got the feeling that Debbie Horsfield was trying to justify what happened next. But what Horsfield did in that scene between Elizabeth and Ross – portraying their encounter as some “fantasy rape” scenario, really disgusted me. And once the series continued on in its adaptations of the next three novels, matters just worse. Horsfield had portrayed Elizabeth as a substance abuser and . . . it was just awful. By Series 4, she was allowing Ross to see Valentine behind George’s back. The literary Elizabeth would have never been that stupid and by “The Angry Tide”, Elizabeth barely had any feelings for Ross, following the rape. Trust me, you would have found Series Three and Four a real travesty.

    • Olga Hughes

      Hi there, sorry for the late reply. I have seen the last two series but I haven’t written about them, I haven’t been able to keep up with the website much the last couple of years.
      I agree Karen’s character was very one-dimensional and I think the writing can’t compare with Graham’s complexities when dealing with characters – generally television wants to dumb things down. The casualty there was Karen, who had to be treated as an airhead who goaded both Mark and Dwight into their behaviour so they could both be forgiven, after she was dead her character became disposable, which is rather sad.
      Again, I agree that the writing in regards to Demelza and Elizabeth has been very lacking – it is all very tawdry soap opera, pitting the women against each other and really glorifying Ross’s character. One aspect that really angered me was Demelza using Hugh to “get back” at Ross for his “affair” with Elizabeth. The substance abuse/unhappy housewife trope they subjected Elizabeth to was terrible and very far removed from her real character, as you mentioned.
      The next series is supposed to be the last although I find that an odd decision, considering Stranger from the Sea (which should be the next lot of material they have) opens up a lot of new storylines.

  6. Lee Jones

    I had recently read an article about the 1953 novel, “Warleggan”. In it, the author, Ellen Moody, had indicated that she believe Elizabeth had consented to have sex with Ross . . . after the initial rape. I don’t know why she had come to this conclusion. Was it because Ross had remained at Trenwith overnight?

    • Olga Hughes

      Hi Lee. I don’t think I can agree Elizabeth consented to anything even if he forced himself on her a second time, or multiple times, it is all the same act of sexual assault. I assume he was there a few hours but perhaps not all night. Typically someone in Elizabeth’s social position would have kept late hours, and he had a few miles ride each way in the dark and arrived home at 6 am (Demelza’s estimate) or 5 am (his estimate).

  7. Ronni

    I have only seen Poldark with with Aidan Turner. I haven’t read the books or seen the other series However, I argued with my sister that it was rape. They couldn’t make the sean to not look like vengefull rape to me. Ross was a self centered lovable jerk in the movie.

    • Olga Hughes

      Hi Ronni, yes it was absolutely a vengeful act. What surprised me was the producers and Winston Graham’s son trying to deny it when it is there in the text, it’s never really ambiguous. It’s more that readers don’t want to think Ross is capable. Not only was he capable he encouraged another character to do the same later on in the books.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.